Probe into the insurrection

After the impeachment: Nancy Pelosi want the capitol attack investigated like 9/11

In the wake of Republican senators caving to Trump over impeachment, the House Speaker has called for a probe into the January 6 insurrection — and even some of the former president’s allies appear to be on board

“We must get to the truth of how this happened,” the House Speaker wrote in a letter to colleagues

.politics
POLITICS PRESS GROUP

For Democrats and a shamefully small number of Republicans, last week’s impeachment trial was not only about holding Donald Trump accountable for his actions—it was also about sending a message, to him and other would-be American autocrats, that the country cannot again go down the road to insurrection. “If the Senate acquits Donald Trump, then any president could incite and provoke insurrectionary violence against us again,” impeachment manager Jamie Raskin pleaded with his Capitol Hill colleagues. His appeal, however convincing, failed to move move Republican Senators, and the right and just thing was overpowered by the politics of the moment.

But now, in the wake of Trump’s acquittal, questions of liability and security going forward seem to be moving out of the political realm. Criminal probes circling the former president, including a new one in Georgia, are threatening to hold him accountable where the Senate did not.

Meanwhile, Nancy Pelosi on Monday announced an independent probe into the January 6 riot, similar to the 9/11 Commission that conducted an exhaustive, bipartisan review of the 2001 terrorist attacks, to examine how the siege came to be and how similar incidents can be prevented in the future.

“We must get to the truth of how this happened,” the House Speaker wrote in a letter to colleagues, citing revelations from Raskin’s impeachment case and an “interim” security report on the attack by Retired Army General Russel Honoré.

The 9/11 Commission, formed in 2002 by then-President George W. Bush, spent more than a year investigating the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, and produced a nearly 600-page report outlining its findings, including that the terrorist attacks could have been prevented, were it not for failures at the CIA and FBI.

For Pelosi, the Times notes, “establishing such a commission would most likely require legislation if it were modeled on the 9/11 Commission.” Members of both parties have expressed support for the establishment of such a commission to investigate the January 6 attack, with even some who voted to acquit Trump, like Lindsey Graham, backing the plan. “We need a 9/11 Commission to find out what happened and make sure it never happens again, and I want to make sure that the Capitol footprint can be better defended next time,” the Trump ally said on Fox News Sunday.

Of course, while there’s certainly more to learn about the events of that day, we already know what happened on January 6, and Graham’s call for an independent commission to deal with the matter seems an awfully convenient way of avoiding having to do so himself—just as Mitch McConnell pointedly noting in a floor speech Saturday that “former presidents are not immune” from civil or criminal accountability allowed him to punt on his own duty to hold Trump accountable.

The need for an independent investigation and real accountability is clear, but the promise of it should not be an excuse for political leaders to wash their hands of it.

It seems a majority of Americans agree.

A new ABC News/Ipsos poll published Monday found nearly 60% of Americans believe Trump should have been convicted, and more than 75% believe senators voted based on partisan politics in the case. Even a so-called “independent” probe is not necessarily above the political fray—the 9/11 Commission was surrounded by its own controversies, and the report it produced was seen by some as going easy on the Bush administration’s performance.

But in operating from at least some remove from the toxic morass of day-to-day politics, such a panel could carry more authority than the congressional committees already examining the January 6 attack—and continue Raskin’s work of building a record of what happened that day and who was responsible for it. “There’s still more evidence that the American people need and deserve to hear,” Democratic Senator Chris Coons said on This Week Sunday.

“A 9/11 Commission is a way to make sure that we secure the Capitol going forward and that we lay bare the record of just how responsible and how abjectly violating of his constitutional oath President Trump really was.”

Read more

Jeff Sessions claims he’s clueless about his DOJ’s snooping on Congress

Former Attorney General Jeff Sessions is telling associates he had no idea his Justice Department seized phone records of two top Democratic congressional critics of then-President Donald Trump. In the hours since The New York Times broke the news on Thursday that prosecutors subpoenaed Apple metadata from Reps. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and Eric Swalwell (D-CA), former Attorney General Sessions has privately told people that he wasn’t aware of, nor was he briefed on, the reported data seizures while he led the Trump DOJ. This week’s revelations were a surprise to him, according to a source familiar with the matter, and another person close to Sessions.

Watchdog investigates seizure of Democrats’ phone data

The US justice department’s internal watchdog launched an investigation on Friday after revelations that former president Donald Trump’s administration secretly seized phone data from at least two House Democrats as part of an aggressive leaks inquiry related to the Russia investigation into Trump’s conduct.

Trump feared Democrats would replace Biden with Michelle Obama, book claims

Donald Trump called Joe Biden a “mental retard” during the 2020 election, a new book says, but was reluctant to attack him too strongly for fear the Democrats would replace him with Hillary Clinton or Michelle Obama. Biden went on to beat Trump by more than 7m in the popular vote and by 306-232 in the electoral college, a result Trump deemed a landslide when it was in his favor against Clinton in 2016.

Intelligence failures left police officers exposed to a violent mob of Trump supporters

The deadly insurrection at the US Capitol was “planned in plain sight” but intelligence failures left police officers exposed to a violent mob of Trump supporters, a Senate investigation has found. The Capitol police intelligence division had been gathering online data since December about plots to storm the building on 6 January, including messages such as: “Bring guns. It’s now or never.” But a combination of bad communications, poor planning, faulty equipment and lack of leadership meant the warnings went unheeded, allowing the insurrectionists to overrun the Capitol and disrupt certification of Joe Biden’s election victory. Five people died.